Kalmanson
v. Kalmanson,
785 So. 2d
753 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
The mother
brought an action to require supervised visitation between the father
and the parties’ children. The trial court entered the requested order
based upon counsel’s representations and without requiring an
evidentiary hearing.
Ms.
Lippincott represented the father on appeal. The appellate court held
that the father was entitled to an evidentiary hearing, and the court
reversed and remanded the child custody order with directions that an
evidentiary hearing be expedited.
